Image default
Worldview

Answers to Five Important Questions About the Ravi Zacharias Allegations

When Ravi Zacharias passed away from cancer earlier this year, Christians around the world paid tribute to him. I was one of them. I’ve always had the highest respect not just for his intellect but also for his character. As I tweeted following his tragic passing, he embodied what I perceived to be the ideal spirit of an apologist—a high intelligence that never eclipsed his love and grace. 

Thus, I was shocked when Christianity Today published a recent article detailing the horrifying allegations several women have made against him regarding sexual immorality/abuse. A flood of emotions came over me: disbelief, skepticism, sorrow. 

I do not profess to know the truth of the situation. The alarming allegations remain, at the moment, allegations. Everyone involved deserves to be heard and properly investigated. Therefore, I initially decided to refrain from comment. But whether the allegations prove to be true or false, they have sparked an important cultural conversation, and the issues and questions they have raised should be addressed. 

1. How Should Christians Respond?

With prayer, wisdom, and discernment (Proverbs 8:12). We need honest conversations, not impulsive “hot takes.” Final judgement should be reserved until the allegations have been sufficiently investigated. The #MeToo movement has shown Christians that sexual sin and the abuse of power are not reserved only for likely candidates. To respond immediately, “The women are obviously lying, because he would never do something like that,” has repeatedly proven to be irresponsible. Not even the greatest saints can transcend their fallen, sinful human nature. 

At the same time, the #BelieveAllWomen movement has also demonstrated that sin affects all people, and not all allegations are true or well-intentioned. More than anyone else, Christians should be committed to truth and justice, regardless of what we desperately want to be true.

2. He’s Dead. Shouldn’t Christians Just Let Him Be?

This response has come up a lot. After all, why dig up the skeletons of a man who is so beloved and admired? Why highlight the bad side of a man who did so much good? While Christians should avoid the Postmodernist/deconstructionist mindset that seeks to tear men and women down with sinful gluttony, there are at least two reasons why it’s appropriate (necessary, even) to have these conversations.

First, the consequences of sinful behavior do not follow us to the grave. The women this alleged sexual sin has impacted should not be ignored simply because the person who wronged them is gone. 

Second, Christians should be more concerned about protecting God’s reputation than man’s. That’s not to imply God needs “protecting,” only that by ignoring, dismissing, or accepting sin in order to guard the cultural reputation of a Christian leader is to make a mockery of God’s holiness and to tarnish our witness of Him in the eyes of the world (Proverbs 17:15, Isaiah 1:17).   

3. But Isn’t Everyone a Sinner?

“For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23) is often cited in the aftermath of a public moral failure. The quote is essentially Christian-speak for, “Hey man, nobody’s perfect.” Indeed, nobody is perfect, but that verse isn’t our “get out of jail free” card. When Jesus encountered a woman living a sinful lifestyle, He didn’t say, “Everyone has shortcomings. Just make sure you do well in the other areas of your life.” Instead, he said, “Go and sin no more” (John 8:11). Romans 3:23 cautions us to be more serious and alert about sin, not less. 

Dismissing sin on grounds of “everyone sins” is to rationalize it. When the Church lavishly praises a Christian leader’s ministry while turning a blind eye to the person’s sin, they set a destructive (not to mention unbiblical) precedent. Our sinful nature is not an excuse to harbor a pet sin. Rather, acknowledging our fallen nature is a serious reminder to be intentional about guarding our hearts and minds and to be diligent in holding the faith community accountable. 

4. If True, Does It Diminish His Apologetic Teachings?

Yes and no. Does his behavior impact the veracity of his arguments? No. Arguments are measured against God’s objective truth, not man’s character. A truth does not become false due to an exposed sin. Zacharias’ teaching has edified and strengthen countless Christians through the years, and that impact isn’t undone.  

On the other hand, if the allegations are true, the credibility and “currency” of his teachings are diminished. Some of Jesus’ harshest statements were reserved for hypocritical religious teachers (Matthew 23:27-28). Teachers who do not practice (or act in direct opposition to) their own teachings give students no reason to believe or accept such teachings. Their moral teachings will be understandably overshadowed by hypocrisy. 

5. What Lesson Should the Church Take from This?

First, Christians must be diligent to be above reproach (1 Timothy 3:2). Even if these allegations prove groundless, it is almost inevitable that an unbelieving world will awaken to this formidable weapon against the Church. Unfortunately, for many people, the mere allegation (even if later debunked) will be enough to affirm and increase their hostility toward the Church and Christian hypocrisy. 

Second, nobody is invincible to temptation and sin. Christians cannot allow admiration and good works to blind them to injustice or sin. Sin has a way of exposing itself eventually (Luke 12:2-4). Ignoring sin by looking the other direction or sweeping it under a rug only amplifies that sin’s devastation.  

What systems are we putting in place to hold Christians accountable? To be clear, biblical accountability does more than wait in the weeds with a cocked-and-ready finger of accusation. Accountability calls out sin, but it also helps people overcome temptation and pulls them back to safety before they tumble into the destructive pits of sin. In many of these public downfalls, the moral failing is explained as a “release” from the pressures of Christian ministry or the paradoxical isolation that results from being elevated to a public spokesperson and champion of the faith. These circumstances do not excuse the sin, but they remind us that Christian shepherds need support, guidance, and accountability like everyone else.

Related posts

Why We Should Get Rid of “Christian Art”

Daniel Blackaby

A Simple Gospel for Complicated People

Daniel Blackaby

Is Silence Violence?

Montgomery Loehlein

4 comments

Avatar
Steven Baughman October 6, 2020 at 3:24 pm

I’m a little disappointed that you still think there is room for these allegations from multiple women and his former business partner to “prove groundless.”

If you wanna do some research simply Google “Ravi Zacharias spa“ where are you will see good investigative work by Christian journalists

Reply
Avatar
The Collision October 6, 2020 at 3:57 pm

Hey Steven, I appreciate the comment. I researched the allegations as best I could with the publicly available information. They are serious allegations and I do not dismiss or call into question the credibility of witnesses or the journalists. At the same time, the allegations were published a week ago and I believe they warrant further investigation and discussion. People have been wronged on both ends in these situations by rushed judgement. I’m not a journalist, so the purpose of this article was not to pass judgment either way; only to raise awareness of the allegations and to suggest some lessons the Christian community can learn from it (regardless of what comes from the continuing investigations). Thanks for reading the article and sharing your thoughts.

Reply
Avatar
Lindsay Brandt December 24, 2020 at 8:00 pm

Hi, Daniel. I know you wrote this back in October, but I sincerely appreciate your telling Christians that saying “Everyone sins” is dismissive. I am a volunteer on connect.rzim.org, and it has been incredibly painful reading the comments. I went through abuse at the hands of church leadership not very long ago, and it was a horrifying experience to try to come forward about it. Seeing people’s dismissive comments (and they are trying to claim they are not dismissive) is re-traumatizing for me. I wish you and others who are more balanced in your thinking would sign on and weigh in. There is a difference between a repentant sinner and an unrepentant one, and true repentance in a case like this is never a private matter to be between God and the individual. True repentance does not demonize the victims and continue to cover up the sin. He had a chance to confess in 2017 and chose to publicly condemn the victims. So this thing of people comparing Ravi to David or Peter or Moses boggles my mind.

Reply
Avatar
The Collision December 29, 2020 at 9:51 pm

Thank you for sharing, Lindsay. Thank you for your testimony. I am sorry to hear of your experience, and cannot imagine how painful this particular case must be given your close proximity to it. I commend you for your courage, and I continue to pray that truth and justice will be had with the remainder of the investigation.

—Daniel

Reply

Leave a Comment